Publicathion Ethics

Inteligensi : Journal of Education is a peer-reviewed journal. This statement explains the ethical behavior of all parties involved in the publishing action of articles in this journal, including authors, editors-in-chief, Editorial Boards, peer reviewers and publishers (Education Faculty). This statement is based on the Best Practices Guidance for COPE Journal Editors.

Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publications
Publication of articles in the journal Inteligensi will examined by peers as an important building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. This is a direct reflection of the work quality of the authors and the institutions that support them. The reviewed articles support and embody scientific methods, therefore its important to agree on the expected ethical standards of conduct for all parties involved in publishing actions: authors, journal editors, peer reviewers, publishers, and the public.
Education Faculty as a publisher of Journal Inteligensi carries out its trust duties for all stages of publication very seriously and we recognize ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprints, or other commercial revenue have no impact or effect on editorial decisions. In addition, the Educations Faculty of the Tribhuwana Tunggadewi University and the Editorial Board will assist in communication with other journals and/or publishers where this is useful and necessary.

Publication Decision
Editor of Inteligensi is responsible for deciding which articles are submitted to the journal to be published related to the scope and conditions of the journal. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers should always encourage such decisions. Editors can be guided by the policy of the editorial board of the journal and are limited by the legal requirements as currently applicable with respect to defamation, copyright infringement and plagiarism. Editors can negotiate with editors or other reviewers in making this decision.

The game is fair
The editor at any time evaluates the manuscripts for their intellectual content irrespective of race, sex, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, nationality, or political philosophy of the author.

Confidentiality
The editor and any editorial staff should not disclose any information about the manuscript submitted to anyone other than the relevant author, observer, potential observer, other editorial advisors, and publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflict of interest
Unpublished material disclosed in submitted manuscripts may not be used in the research editors themselves without the written consent of the author.

Viewer's Tasks

Contributions to Editorial Decisions
Peer reviews help editors in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communication with authors can also assist authors in improving papers.

Speed
Any selected referee who feels ineligible to review the research reported in the script or knows that a quick review may not have to notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Confidentiality
Manuscripts received for review should be treated as confidential documents. They may not be indicated or discussed with others except as authorized by the editors.

Standards of Objectivity
The review should be done objectively. The personal criticism of the author is not correct. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Source Recognition
Reviewers shall identify relevant published works that have not been quoted by the author. Any statement that observation, derivation, or argument has been previously reported should be accompanied by relevant citations. The reviewer should also seek the editor's attention if there are substantial or overlapping similarities between the text under consideration and other published papers that have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Special information or ideas obtained through peer review should be kept confidential and not used for personal gain. Reviewers may not consider manuscripts in which they have a conflict of interest resulting from competition, collaboration, or other relationships or relationships with any of the authors, companies, or agencies linked to the paper.

Author's Duties

Standard reporting
The author of the original research report must present an accurate report on the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. The underlying data should be accurately represented in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient details and references to enable others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or intentionally inaccurate statements are unethical and unacceptable behavior.

Data Access and Retention
Authors are required to provide raw data in connection with papers for editorial reviews, and must be prepared to provide public access to the data (consistently), where possible, and should be in any event. be prepared to keep the data for a reasonable time after publication.

Originality and Plagiarism
The authors shall ensure that they have written works which are completely original, and if the author has used the work and / or the words of others that have been quoted or quoted appropriately.

Duplicate, Redundant, or Simultaneous Publication
A writer should not generally publish a script that explains essentially the same research in more than one major journal or publication. Sending the same script to more than one journal simultaneously is unethical and unacceptable publishing behavior.

Source Recognition
Appropriate recognition of the work of others must always be given. The author should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the work reported.

Paper Stamps
Authors should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, implementation, or interpretation of reported research. Anyone who has made a significant contribution should be registered as a coauthor. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of a research project, they must be recognized or registered as contributors. The appropriate author must ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no coauthor are incorporated on paper, and that all co-authors have reviewed and approved the final version of this paper and have approved the submission for publication.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
All authors should disclose in their text any financial conflicts or other substantive conflicts that may be interpreted to influence the outcome or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental mistake in published work
When a writer finds significant errors or inaccuracies in his published work, it is the duty of the writer to immediately notify the journal or publisher editors and work with the editor to retract or correct the paper.

Plagiarism Policy

Plagiarism Includes But Unlimited to:
(1) Referring and/ or quoting terms, words and/ or sentences, data and/ or information from a source without citing sources in the citation notes and/ or without adequately mentioning the source; (2) Referring and/or citing random terms, words and/or sentences, data and/or information from sources without quoting sources in citation notes and/or without adequately mentioning sources; (3) Using the source of ideas, opinions, views, or theories without adequately declaring the source; (4) Formulate the words and/ or sentences themselves from the source of words and/or phrases, ideas, opinions, views, or theories without adequately declaring the source; (5) Submit a scientific paper produced and/or published by others as a source of scientific work without adequately disclosing it.

Prevention
Inteligensi Journal will ensure that any published article will not exceed 20% equality score. Plagiarism screening will be done by Turnitin.

Penalty:
Every mistake that has been done by the author in plagiarism part will be given penalty in form of: (1) Warning letter; (2) Revocation of articles; (3) Revocation of publication.

Guidelines for Submission

(Guidelines For Online Submission) 

1. The author must first register as an author.
2. Authors must fill out the form as detailed as possible according to the questions asked. 
3. After all filled. The author clicks the "Register" button to continue registration, then the author will enter the submission page to enter a new manuscript into "New Submission". 
4. In the Start New Submission section, click "Click here: to go to step one of the five-step filing process". Here are the five steps in the online submission process:

• The author must check the submission list and agree to the copyright notice from the Reference. Then, click "Save and Continue" 
• Upload the script by clicking "Browse" on the item, then click "Upload" Then, click "Save and Continue"
• Inserting Submission Metadata: In this step, author metadata details must be included including the marked authors accordingly. Then click "Save and Continue" 
• Upload additional data in the supplementary column in the form of script turnitin results below 20%, then click "Save and Continue.
• Confirm the manuscript

Terms of Citation and References

• In text-citation, the authors and the year must be indicated (García & Pujol, 2017). If there are three or more authors, “et al.” should be used from the first appearance (Zapata et al., 2019) (except whether it is to disambiguate different references with the same first author and year).
  
  
• If you are directly quoting, you should indicate the page or paragraph number, if it is a web reference (García, 2017, p. 21) (García & Pujol, 2019, para. 5). If you are directly quoting 40 words or more, use a separate paragraph with a left margin increased by 1.5 cm.
  
  
• Citations from web pages without a date of publication should be marked with (s. f.) to replace the year.

• In APA 7 guidelines, the city of publication is not indicated. Furthermore, it is not used "retrieved from" to indicate the web page. It is added at the end of the reference without a full stop. The date of access of the website is only added in the case of changing websites such as wikis. In general, in all other cases, it should not be added. It must be checked to ensure that it works. The URL must lead exactly to the cited document, not to the general page of the website.
  
  
• Book chapters are only indicated in the case of edited or coordinated books. The editors or coordinators should always be indicated, as well as the pages.
  
  
• All authors (until a maximum of 20) must be indicated. If there are more, the first 19 should be indicated, followed by ellipses, and the last one.
  
  
• If there are several references that coincide with authors and year, they should be disambiguated with a letter after the year, e.g. 2009a, 2009b…

Author Fees

This journal charges the following author fees.

Article Submission: 0.00 (IDR)
Authors are not required to pay an Article Submission Fee

Start at June 2024 there's a change of publications fee since Inteligensi has been accredited Sinta 4, as below

Article Publication: 400.000,00 (IDR)

When we decide to accept and publish your article after the peer-review process, you have to pay IDR 400,000. Article Publication Fee included plagiarism checker with Turnitin, peer reviewing, editing, publishing, maintaning and archiving. This amount also 1 book of print journal, shipping cost, and DOI registration for each paper.

Author should pay the article processing and publication fees via bank transfer (after receiving the article acceptance e-mail from us) to:

UNIVERSITAS TRIBHUWANA TUNGGADEWI
Bank Negara Indonesia (BNI)
Account number: 8833 388 779

Please send the receipt to confirm the payment via WA (081333503373) or to email : [email protected]  (with subject: [Id Articles_Payment Inteligensi])