Rudi Subiyakto


The purpose of this study is to present the results of the evaluation of the development of transmigration areas using index numbers. This study uses quantitative methods, especially to determine index numbers. The research data was collected using a questionnaire, the respondents consisted of elements of the government, the private sector, and the community. Respondents gave scores on the questionnaire which was guided directly by the researcher. 150 respondents were divided into 5 groups according to the number of evaluation dimensions. Determination of the index following the technique of multidimensional scaling (MDS). The index results show that the Pamulutan Transmigration Area is included in the category of autonomy. After receiving intervention in several dimensions as a strengthening program for the next 5 years, the area has become a competitive transmigration area. The results showed that the Parit Rambutan area met the autonomy and competitive criteria. Meanwhile, Indralaya and West Pamulutan are still in the undeveloped category. The results of this evaluation become a recommendation for the Ministry of Transmigration to make regulations and intervention actions in the development of transmigration areas for the next 5 years.


Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk memaparkan hasil evaluasi pengembangan kawasan transmigrasi dengan menggunakan angka indeks. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kuantitatif, terutama untuk menentukan angka indeks. Pengumpulan data penelitian dilakukan dengan menggunakan kuesioner, responden terdiri dari unsur pemerintah, swasta, dan masyarakat. Responden memberikan skor pada kuesioner yang dipandu langsung oleh peneliti. 150 responden dibagi menjadi 5 kelompok sesuai dengan jumlah dimensi evaluasi. Penentuan indeks mengikuti teknik multidimensional scaling (MDS). Hasil indeks menunjukkan bahwa Kawasan Transmigrasi Pamulutan termasuk dalam kategori otonomi. Setelah mendapat intervensi dalam beberapa dimensi sebagai program penguatan selama 5 tahun ke depan, kawasan tersebut menjadi kawasan transmigrasi yang berdaya saing. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kawasan Parit Rambutan memenuhi kriteria otonomi dan kompetitif. Sedangkan Indralaya dan Pamulutan Barat masih dalam kategori belum berkembang. Hasil evaluasi ini menjadi rekomendasi bagi Kementerian Transmigrasi untuk membuat regulasi dan tindakan intervensi dalam pengembangan kawasan transmigrasi untuk 5 tahun ke depan.


evaluation; development; transmigration area; Ogan Ilir Regency

Full Text:



Alder, J,Pitcher, T,J, Preikshot, D.Kaschener, and Feriss, B, 2000, How Good is Good ? A Rapid Appraisal Technique for Evaluation of Sustainability Status of Fisheries of the North Atlantic, In Pauly and Pither (eds). Methods for Evaluation the Impact of Fisheries Center Research Reports, 2000 Vol 8 (2).

Alkin, Marvin C., dan Jean, A.K., 2016, The Historical of Evaluation Development Use, American Journal of Evaluation. DOI: 10.1177/1098214016665164aje.sagepub.com

Arensman B, van Waegeningh C and van Wessel M (2018) Twinning ‘practices of change’ with ‘theory of change’: Room for emergence in advocacy evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation 39(2): 221–36.

Arensman B, van Wessel M and Hilhorst D (2017) Does local ownership bring about effectiveness? The case of a transnational advocacy network. Third World Quarterly 38(6): 1310–26.

Bamberger M, Vaessen J and Raimondo E (eds) (2016) Dealing with Complexity in Development, Evaluation: A Practical Approach. London: SAGE.

Budi Harsono, S. (2018). Manual Penentuan Status dan Faktor Pengungkit PEL. Direktorat Perkotaan dan Pedesaan,

Dunn, William (2016). Public Policy Analysis An Integrated Approach. Sixth Edition. New York, Routledge

Edison. 2009. Penelitian dan Evaluasi Dalam Bidang Pendidikan: Evaluasi CIPP, (Online),

Imas, Linda G. M., and Ray C. Rist. 2009. The Road to Results: Designing and Conducting Eff ective Development Evaluations. Washington, DC: World Bank.

Mulyono. 2009. Penelitian Eveluasi Kebijakan, (Online), (http:// mulyono. staff.uns .ac.id /2009/ 05/13/penelitian-evaluasi-kebijakan/, diakses 11 April 2022)

Owen, John M. 2006. Program Evaluation: Forms and Appoaches. Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin

Paul J. Gertler, Sebastian Martinez, Patrick Premand, Laura B. Rawlings, and Christel M. J. Vermeersch, 2016, Impact Evaluation in Practice Second Edition, International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank

Rika Dwi Kurniasih. 2009. Teknik Evaluasi Perencanaan, (Online), (http:// images.rikania09.multiply.multiplycontent.com/attachment/0/SUdfiwoKCF8AADuyo-81/Rika%20Eva.doc?nmid=148657139, diakses 12 April 2022).

Robert E. Stake.2004. Standars-Based & Responsive Evaluation. California: Sage Publication, Inc.

Scheerens, J., C Glas, SM Thomas, 2003, Educational Evaluation, Assessment and Monitoring: a Systemic Approach, Swets & Zeitlinger

Stufflebeam, D.L. & Shinkfield, A.J. (1985). Systematic evaluation:a self-instructional guide to theory and practice. Kluwer-Nijholf Publishing

Stufflebeam, Daniel L. and Chris L. S. Coryn (2014) Evaluation theory, Models, And Applications

Abstract - Print this article - Indexing metadata - How to cite item - Finding References Review policy - Email this article (Login required) - Email the author (Login required)


  • There are currently no refbacks.