KOLABORASI MULTI AKTOR DALAM PENGELOLAAN WISATA GEO PARK BELITUNG
Abstract
This study aims to describe the collaboration of multi-actor in managing tourism GeoPark Belitung. This tourism management has succeeded in bringing the Belitung GeoPark into the UNESCO assessment as one of the international tourism destinations. Various actors, both from the government, private sector, and community, have contributed greatly. Contributions are given in accordance with the roles and functions. Each institution cooperates, communicates, and coordinates so as to build good collaboration. This research uses a qualitative approach, aiming to explain the phenomenon of GeoPark tourism management even in the pandemic era. The research lasted for 2 months from November to December 2020. There were 10 research resource persons from government, private and community elements who represented the institution. The research results provide in-depth information on successful collaborative practices. The results of this study provide a conceptual contribution to multi-actor collaboration in the field of tourism management.
Abstrak
Penelitian ini bertujuan mendiskripsikan kolaborasi multi actor dalam mengelola pariwisata GeoPark Belitung. Pengelolaan pariwisata ini berhasil mengantarkan GeoPark Belitung masuk dalam penilaian UNESCO sebagai salah satu destinasi pariwisata internasional. Berbagai actor baik dari unsur pemerintah, swasta, dan komunitas memiliki kontribusi yang besar. Kontribusi yang diberikan sesuai dengan peran dan fungsi. Tiap lembaga melakukan kerjasama, komunikasi, dan koordinasi sehingga membangun kolaborasi yang baik.. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif, bertujuan mengeksplanasi fenomena pengelolaan pariwisata GeoPark meskipun di era pandemi. Penelitian berlangsung selama 2 bulan dari Nopember sampai dengan Desember 2020. Nara sumber penelitian dari unsur pemerintah, swasta, dan komunitas sebanyak 10 orang yang merepresentasi lembaganya. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pengelolaan wisata geopark dilakukan oleh pemerintah, swasta, dan masyarakat. Tiap lembaga memiliki sekaligus melaksanakan otoritas dan perannya. Secara umum ketiga lembaga tersebut memiliki kesamaan komitmen untuk menjaga pelesatarian Geopark. Tiap lembaga memiliki kepentingan, pengaruh, dan kekuatan. Secara komparatif, lembaga pemerintah dalam hal ini Dinas Pariwisata memiliki dominansi dibandingkan lembaga swasta dan komunitas yang ada. Hasil penelitian ini sekaligus menggambarkan kolaborasi multiaktor yang berhasil.Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Amit, R., & Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1993). Strategic asset and organisational rent. Strategic Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250140105
Bramwell, B. (2011). Governance, the state and sustainable tourism: A political economy approach. In Journal of Sustainable Tourism (Vol. 19, Issues 4–5, pp. 459–477). https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2011.576765
Bramwell, B., & Lane, B. (2011). Critical research on the governance of tourism and sustainability. In Journal of Sustainable Tourism (Vol. 19, Issues 4–5, pp. 411–421). https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2011.580586
De Araujo, L. M., & Bramwell, B. (2002). Partnership and regional tourism in Brazil. Annals of Tourism Research, 29(4), 38–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-7383(02)00033-6
Dinica, V. (2009). Governance for sustainable tourism: A comparison of international and Dutch visions. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 17(5), 583-603. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669580902855836
Dredge, D., & Jamal, T. (2013). Mobilities on the Gold Coast, Australia: Implications for destination governance and sustainable tourism. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 21(4), 557-579. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2013.776064
Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur011
Farmaki, Anna. (2015). Tourism Geographies: An International Journal of Tourism Space, Place and Environment, and Environment, 17:3,385-407. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2015.1036915
Fredricsson, K., and L. Smas. 2013. "Small-Scale Tourism in Rural Areas: Trends and Research in the Nordic Countries. Nordic Working Group 1B: Future Rural Areas." Working Paper 3.Stockholm: Nordregio.
Jones, O., & Little, J. (2000). Rural challenge(s): Partnership and new rural governance. In Journal of Rural Studies (Vol. 16, Issue 2, pp. 171–183). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0743-0167(99)00058-3
Kemp, R., Parto, S., & Gibson, R. B. (2005). Governance for sustainable development: Moving from theory to practice. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 8(1), 12-30. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSD.2005.007372
Keyim, P. (2015). Collaboration and rural development in a tourism context. In Tourism Development (Issue October).
Keyim, Parhad. (2012). Government Roles in Rural Tourism Development: A Case from Turpan. Tourism Today, 12, 113–133.
Keyim, Parhad. (2016). Tourism and rural development in western China: A case from Turpan. Community Development Journal, 51(4), 534–551. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsv046
Keyim, Parhad, & Adamiak, C. (2014). Entrepreneurs’ Perspectives towards Tourism and Rural Development in North Karelia, Finland. Tourism Today, 14, 91–102.
Kismartini, K., & Pujiyono, B. (2020). Collaborative management model tanjung lesung tourism in Pandeglang District, Banten Province, Indonesia. Geojournal of Tourism and Geosites, 30(2), 868–874. https://doi.org/10.30892/gtg.302spl12-516
Logar, I. (2010). Sustainable tourism management in Crkvenica, Croatia: An assessment of policy instruments. Tourism Management, 31, 125-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2009.02.005
Michael Hall, C. (2011). A typology of governance and its implications for tourism policy analysis. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 19(4–5), 437–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2011.570346
Murdoch, J., & Abram, S. (1998). Defining the limits of community governance. Journal of Rural Studies, 14(1), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0743-0167(97)00046-6
OECD. 2006. The New Rural Paradigm: Policies and Governance. Paris: Economic Co-operation and Development.
Pechlaner, H., Ruhanen, L., Scott, N., Ritchie, B., & Tkaczynski, A. (2010). Governance: a review and synthesis of the literature. In Tourism Review (Vol. 65, Issue 4, p. 416). https://doi.org/10.1108/16605371011093836
Saarinen, J. (2007). Contradictions of rural tourism initiatives in rural development contexts: Finnish rural tourism strategy case study. In Current Issues in Tourism (Vol. 10, Issue 1, pp. 96–105). https://doi.org/10.2167/cit287.0
Teece, D. J. (2018a). Dynamic capabilities as (workable) management systems theory. Journal of Management and Organization, 24 (3), 359-368. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2017.75
Waligo, V.M., Clarke, J., & Hawkins, R. (2013). Implementing sustainable tourism: A multi-stakeholder involvement management framework. Tourism Management, 36, 342-353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2012.10.008
Wesley, A., & Pforr, C. (2010). The governance of coastal tourism: Unravelling the layers of complexity at Smiths Beach, Western Australia. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 18(6), 773-792. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669581003721273
Zahra, A. L. (2011). Rethinking regional tourism governance: The principle of subsidiarity. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 19(45), 535-552. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2011.576764
Zapata, M. J., & Hall, C. M. (2012). Public-private collaboration in the tourism sector: Balancing legitimacy and effectiveness in local tourism partnerships. The Spanish case. Journal of Policy Research in Tourism, Leisure and Events, 4(1), 61–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/19407963.2011.634069
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
