Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Care Focus: Scientific Journal of Health Sciences is a four-monthly periodic journal that contains various articles/manuscripts in the form of research results, case studies, ideas, and scientific papers by the entire health professional community, from students, lecturers, clinical nurses, and working nurses. in non-clinical institutions such as research institutions, health insurance, and government. Scientific work in the form of health articles.

The focus and scope of this journal are :

Nursing including :

  • Nursing Care,
  • Education And Health Education,
  • Emergency Nursing, Medical Surgical Nursing,
  • Critical Nursing,
  • Pediatric Nursing,
  • Maternity Nursing,
  • Geriatric Nursing,
  • Family Nursing,
  • Palliative Nursing,
  • Nursing Management,
  • Psychiatric Nursing
  • Ethics,
  • Laws In Nursing.

Health include :

  • Physical Health,
  • Environmental Health,
  • Mental Health,
  • Social Health,
  • Reproductive And Sexual Health,
  • Child Health,
  • Adolescent Health,
  • Elderly Health,
  • Epidemiology,
  • Health Innovation.

Public Health include :

  • Health promotion,
  • disease prevention,
  • environmental health,
  • occupational health,
  • safety,
  • maternal and child health,
  • control of infectious diseases,
  • health policy,
  • public health management.

 

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

The submitted manuscript is first reviewed by an editor and must be free from plagiarism contents, the maximum limit of similarity is 25% (Turnitin). The submitted manuscript will be evaluated, whether it is suitable for our focus and scope or has a major methodological flaw.

The submitted manuscripts to this journal will be peer-reviewed at least 2 (two) or more expert reviewers from Peer-Reviewers Team. The reviewers give valuable comments improving the contents of the manuscript. The review process used in this journal is a double blind review system.

Reviewing process will consider novelty, objectivity, method, impact, conclusion, and references. The suggested decision will be evaluated in an editorial board meeting. Reviewers' comments are then sent to the corresponding author for necessary actions and responses, hopefully in 4-6 weeks.

The final decision of manuscript acceptance is solely made by Editor in Chief/Associate Editor (together with Editorial Board if required) according to reviewers' critical comments. The final decision of the manuscript is solely based on the Editor's final review which considering peer-reviewers comments (but not solely by Reviewer).

Publication of accepted articles including assigning the article to the published will be made by Editor in Chief by the sequence of accepted date and geographical distribustion of autors as thematic issue.

 

 

Publication Frequency

Care: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Kesehatan published regularly three time a year in: March, July, November.

Important Dates:

  • Paper submission date: Anytime
  • Acceptance notification: hopefully in 2-3 months from the submission date

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA)

This journal is open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to users or / institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to full text articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or author. This is in accordance with Budapest Open Access Initiative

Budapest Open Access Initiative

An old tradition and a new technology have converged to make possible an unprecedented public good. The old tradition is the willingness of scientists and scholars to publish the fruits of their research in scholarly journals without payment, for the sake of inquiry and knowledge. The new technology is the internet. The public good they make possible is the world-wide electronic distribution of the peer-reviewed journal literature and completely free and unrestricted access to it by all scientists, scholars, teachers, students, and other curious minds. Removing access barriers to this literature will accelerate research, enrich education, share the learning of the rich with the poor and the poor with the rich, make this literature as useful as it can be, and lay the foundation for uniting humanity in a common intellectual conversation and quest for knowledge.

For various reasons, this kind of free and unrestricted online availability, which we will call open access, has so far been limited to small portions of the journal literature. But even in these limited collections, many different initiatives have shown that open access is economically feasible, that it gives readers extraordinary power to find and make use of relevant literature, and that it gives authors and their works vast and measurable new visibility, readership, and impact. To secure these benefits for all, we call on all interested institutions and individuals to help open up access to the rest of this literature and remove the barriers, especially the price barriers, that stand in the way. The more who join the effort to advance this cause, the sooner we will all enjoy the benefits of open access.

The literature that should be freely accessible online is that which scholars give to the world without expectation of payment. Primarily, this category encompasses their peer-reviewed journal articles, but it also includes any unreviewed preprints that they might wish to put online for comment or to alert colleagues to important research findings. There are many degrees and kinds of wider and easier access to this literature. By "open access" to this literature, we mean its free availability on the public internet, permitting any users to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of these articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without financial, legal, or technical barriers other than those inseparable from gaining access to the internet itself. The only constraint on reproduction and distribution, and the only role for copyright in this domain, should be to give authors control over the integrity of their work and the right to be properly acknowledged and cited.

While  the peer-reviewed journal literature should be accessible online without cost to readers, it is not costless to produce. However, experiments show that the overall costs of providing open access to this literature are far lower than the costs of traditional forms of dissemination. With such an opportunity to save money and expand the scope of dissemination at the same time, there is today a strong incentive for professional associations, universities, libraries, foundations, and others to embrace open access as a means of advancing their missions. Achieving open access will require new cost recovery models and financing mechanisms, but the significantly lower overall cost of dissemination is a reason to be confident that the goal is attainable and not merely preferable or utopian.

To achieve open access to scholarly journal literature, we recommend two complementary strategies. 

I.  Self-Archiving: First, scholars need the tools and assistance to deposit their refereed journal articles in open electronic archives, a practice commonly called, self-archiving. When these archives conform to standards created by the Open Archives Initiative, then search engines and other tools can treat the separate archives as one. Users then need not know which archives exist or where they are located in order to find and make use of their contents.

II. Open-access Journals: Second, scholars need the means to launch a new generation of journals committed to open access, and to help existing journals that elect to make the transition to open access. Because journal articles should be disseminated as widely as possible, these new journals will no longer invoke copyright to restrict access to and use of the material they publish. Instead they will use copyright and other tools to ensure permanent open access to all the articles they publish. Because price is a barrier to access, these new journals will not charge subscription or access fees, and will turn to other methods for covering their expenses. There are many alternative sources of funds for this purpose, including the foundations and governments that fund research, the universities and laboratories that employ researchers, endowments set up by discipline or institution, friends of the cause of open access, profits from the sale of add-ons to the basic texts, funds freed up by the demise or cancellation of journals charging traditional subscription or access fees, or even contributions from the researchers themselves. There is no need to favor one of these solutions over the others for all disciplines or nations, and no need to stop looking for other, creative alternatives.


Open access to peer-reviewed journal literature is the goal. Self-archiving (I.) and a new generation of open-access journals (II.) are the ways to attain this goal. They are not only direct and effective means to this end, they are within the reach of scholars themselves, immediately, and need not wait on changes brought about by markets or legislation. While we endorse the two strategies just outlined, we also encourage experimentation with further ways to make the transition from the present methods of dissemination to open access. Flexibility, experimentation, and adaptation to local circumstances are the best ways to assure that progress in diverse settings will be rapid, secure, and long-lived.

The Open Society Institute, the foundation network founded by philanthropist George Soros, is committed to providing initial help and funding to realize this goal. It will use its resources and influence to extend and promote institutional self-archiving, to launch new open-access journals, and to help an open-access journal system become economically self-sustaining. While the Open Society Institute's commitment and resources are substantial, this initiative is very much in need of other organizations to lend their effort and resources.

We invite governments, universities, libraries, journal editors, publishers, foundations, learned societies, professional associations, and individual scholars who share our vision to join us in the task of removing the barriers to open access and building a future in which research and education in every part of the world are that much more free to flourish.

 

 

Archiving

Care: Scientific Journal of Health Science utilizes GARUDA Garba Rujukan Digital to create a permanent archive of the journal for preservation and restoration purposes.

 

Use of Reference Manager

Every article submitted to Care must use APA style

 

Publication Ethics

Care: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Kesehatan is a peer-reviewed journal. This statement explains the ethical behavior of all parties involved in the publishing action of articles in this journal, including authors, editor-in-chiefs, Editorial Boards, peer reviewers and publishers (Faculty of Health Sciences). This statement is based on the Best Practices Guidance for COPE Journal Editors. Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publications Publication of articles in the journal Care: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Kesehatan examined by peers is an important building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. This is a direct reflection of the work quality of the authors and the institutions that support them. The reviewed articles support and embody scientific methods. It is therefore important to agree on the expected ethical standards of conduct for all parties involved in publishing actions: authors, journal editors, peer reviewers, publishers and the public. Faculty of Health Sciences as a publisher of Care: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Kesehatan carries out its trust duties for all stages of publication very seriously and we recognize ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprints, or other commercial revenue have no impact or effect on editorial decisions. In addition, the Faculty of Health Sciences of the University Tribhuwana Tunggadewi and the Editorial Board will assist in communication with other journals and / or publishers where this is useful and necessary. Publication Decision Editor Care: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Kesehatan is responsible for deciding which articles are submitted to the journal to be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers should always encourage such decisions. Editors can be guided by the policy of the editorial board of the journal and are limited by the legal requirements as currently applicable with respect to defamation, copyright infringement and plagiarism. Editors can negotiate with editors or other reviewers in making this decision. The game is fair The editor at any time evaluates the manuscripts for their intellectual content irrespective of race, sex, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, nationality, or political philosophy of the author. Confidentiality The editor and any editorial staff should not disclose any information about the manuscript submitted to anyone other than the relevant author, observer, potential observer, other editorial advisor, and publisher, as appropriate. Disclosure and conflict of interest Unpublished material disclosed in submitted manuscripts may not be used in the research editors themselves without the written consent of the author. Viewer's Tasks Contributions to Editorial Decisions Peer reviews help editors in making editorial decisions and through editorial communication with authors can also assist authors in improving papers. Speed Any elected referee who feels ineligible to review research reported in the script or knows that a quick review may not have to notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Confidentiality Manuscripts received for review should be treated as confidential documents. They may not be indicated or discussed with others except as authorized by the editors. Standards of Objectivity The review should be done objectively. The personal criticism of the author is not correct. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments. Source Recognition Reviewers shall identify relevant published works that have not been quoted by the author. Any statement that observation, derivation, or argument has been previously reported should be accompanied by relevant citations. The reviewer should also seek the editor's attention if there are substantial or overlapping similarities between the text under consideration and other published papers that have personal knowledge. Disclosure and Conflict of Interest Special information or ideas obtained through peer review should be kept confidential and not used for personal gain. Reviewers may not consider manuscripts in which they have a conflict of interest resulting from competition, collaboration, or other relationships or relationships with any of the authors, companies, or agencies linked to the paper. Author's Duties Standard reporting The author of the original research report must present an accurate report on the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. The underlying data should be accurately represented in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient details and references to enable others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or intentionally inaccurate statements are unethical and unacceptable behavior. Data Access and Retention Authors are required to provide raw data in connection with papers for editorial reviews, and must be prepared to provide public access to the data (consistently), where possible, and should be in any event. be prepared to keep the data for a reasonable time after publication. Originality and Plagiarism The authors shall ensure that they have written works which are completely original, and if the author has used the work and / or the words of others that have been quoted or quoted appropriately. Duplicate, Redundant, or Simultaneous Publication A writer should not generally publish a script that explains essentially the same research in more than one major journal or publication. Sending the same script to more than one journal simultaneously is unethical and unacceptable publishing behavior. Source Recognition Appropriate recognition of the work of others must always be given. The author should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the work reported. Paper Stamps Authors should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, implementation, or interpretation of reported research. Anyone who has made a significant contribution should be registered as a coauthor. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of a research project, they must be recognized or registered as contributors. The appropriate author must ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no coauthor are incorporated on paper, and that all co-authors have reviewed and approved the final version of this paper and have approved the submission for publication. Disclosure and Conflict of Interest All authors should disclose in their text any financial conflicts or other substantive conflicts that may be interpreted to influence the outcome or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed. Fundamental mistake in published work When a writer finds significant errors or inaccuracies in his published work, it is the duty of the writer to immediately notify the journal or publisher editors and work with the editor to retract or correct the paper.

 

Plagiarism Policy

Plagiarism Policy Plagiarism Includes But Unlimited to: Referring and / or quoting terms, words and / or sentences, data and / or information from a source without citing sources in the citation notes and / or without adequately mentioning the source; Referring and / or citing random terms, words and / or sentences, data and / or information from sources without quoting sources in citation notes and / or without adequately mentioning sources; Using the source of ideas, opinions, views, or theories without adequately declaring the source; Formulate the words and / or sentences themselves from the source of words and / or phrases, ideas, opinions, views, or theories without adequately declaring the source; Submit a scientific paper produced and / or published by others as a source of scientific work without adequately disclosing it. Prevention Care: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Kesehatan will ensure that any published article will not exceed 25% equality score. Plagiarism screening will be done by Care: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Kesehatan using Plagiarism Checker X Sanctions Warning and turnitin; Warning letter; Revocation of articles; Revocation of publication.

 

GUIDELINES FOR SUBMISSON

GUIDELINE FOR ONLINE SUBMISSON

The author must first register as a Writer here. The author must meet the form as detailed as possible where the form marked with an asterisk must be entered. After all the form text boxes are filled in, the Author clicks the "Register" button to proceed with registration. Therefore, the Author is brought to the online author submission interface where Authors should click "New Submissions". In the Start New Submissions section, click "Click Here: to go to step one of the five-step filing process". Here are five steps in the online shipping process:

Step 1 - Initiate Submission: Authors should check the shipping checklist and agree with the copyright notice of Care: Scientific Journal of Health Sciences with a check mark on the copyright notice checklist. Then, click "Save and Continue"
Step 2 - Upload Submission: To upload a manuscript to this journal, click "Browse" on the Upload submission file item and select the script document (.doc / .docx) file to submit, then click the "Upload" button until the file has been uploaded. Do not upload cover letter and other complementary files here. Then, click "Save and Continue"
Step 3 - Inserting the Submission Metadata: In this step, the author's metadata detail must be included including the corresponding author marked. After that, the title of the script and the abstract must be uploaded by copying the text and pasting it in the text box including the keywords. Then, click "Save and Continue"
Step 4 - Upload an Additional File: If you have a complementary file, click the "Browse" button, select the file, and then click the "Upload" button. This step is optional, if you do not have a supplemetary file, just click "Save and Continue".
Step 5 - Confirm Delivery: The author should check the uploaded manuscript document in this step. To submit a script to Care: Scientific Journal of Health Sciences, click the "Complete Delivery" button after the correct document.
After this submission, the Author submitting the script will get a confirmation email about the submission. Therefore, Authors can track their delivery status anytime by logging into the online delivery interface. Tracking submissions include script review status and editorial process.

If you experience any difficulties please contact us via [email protected] or contact to 081249554004